Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coop
Then come up with a solution.

Good point.

But I see nothing wrong with people who can't devise a solution (so far, in addition to the disappointed posters here, the GOP Senate fits that description) being disappointed, and venting.

I suppose, with the lock that the DEM persuasion has on the media, we can't know whether the masses were deprived of seeing the GOP actions (or even ongoing expression of outrage), or whether there was no such action or expression.

I was excited when Hatch and Bush talked-up the prospect of changing the Senate voting rules as applied to judicial nominees, but that topic got overshadowed by unquestionably more important world developments.

Judicial appointments are a key part of our form of government, and I DO trust the GOP to make the most of the situation. I also believe GWB fully intends to take advantage of the situation, with the goal of reducing judicial activism for us, and our posterity.

90 posted on 09/05/2003 3:35:20 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
Judicial appointments are a key part of our form of government, and I DO trust the GOP to make the most of the situation. I also believe GWB fully intends to take advantage of the situation, with the goal of reducing judicial activism for us, and our posterity.

Er, when do you think he might start? We're talking three years here.
104 posted on 09/05/2003 7:44:42 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson