Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
In California they'd almost certainly be endorsing McClintock OVER Arnie.

Which would followed by the election of Bustamante.

88 posted on 09/03/2003 7:19:38 AM PDT by Archangelsk ("Toss in a buck ya cheap bastard, I paid for your g**damn breakfast." Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Archangelsk
Which would be less damaging to the taxpayers than Schwarzenegger, who will be able to get 2/3rds majorities in the legislature to raise taxes, when he decides there is an "emergency."
90 posted on 09/03/2003 7:23:54 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
If the bulk of the party endorsed a different candidate, why shouldn't ARNIE be LOYAL and throw his support to McClintock?

Who's the one who says it is only a one-way street?

All I hear is "conservatives have to give up their principles and support Arnie."

Why can't it be "Arnie supporters who give up their principles and support McClintock."

After all, "It's for the good of the Party."

94 posted on 09/03/2003 7:27:23 AM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning Was the Word!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson