Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheCPA
Code Sec. 1 (of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended also known as Title 26 of the United States Code) imposes a tax on the taxable income of every individual and gives the rate schedule applicable to each filing status. Code Sec. 63 defines taxable income as gross income minus allowable deductions. Code Sec. 61 defines gross income as all income except for exclusions listed in the Internal Revenue Code or other applicable law.

The question is who is liable for the tax -- not this tax imposed nonsense. Also, the term income is not defined as one can't use the word to define a word as every eighth grader knows. The appeals case U.S. vs Ballard notes that the general term income is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

The reason the IRS will not answer Mrs. Kuglin's questions is that there is no law requiring the filing of income tax returns or the paying of those taxes.

Since the non response of the IRS proves Mrs. Kuglin correct, will you and the other Collectivist kindly stop mis informing people on this issue?

10 posted on 09/01/2003 5:52:14 PM PDT by UbIwerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: UbIwerks
As regards this garbage that income is defined in the Internal Revenue Code, here is what U.S. v Ballard, 535 F 2nd 499 says "The general term "income" is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code....."
11 posted on 09/01/2003 6:03:04 PM PDT by UbIwerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: UbIwerks
From the IRS website

B. Contention: Payment of tax is voluntary.

In a similar vein, some argue that they are not required to pay federal taxes because the payment of federal taxes is voluntary. Proponents of this position argue that our system of taxation is based upon voluntary assessment and payment.

The Law: The requirement to pay taxes is not voluntary and is clearly set forth in section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, which imposes a tax on the taxable income of individuals, estates, and trusts as determined by the tables set forth in that section. (Section 11 imposes a tax on the taxable income of corporations.) Furthermore, the obligation to pay tax is described in  section 6151 , which requires taxpayers to submit payment with their tax returns. Failure to pay taxes could subject the noncomplying individual to criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, as well as civil penalties.

In discussing section 6151, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals stated "when a tax return is required to be filed, the person so required 'shall' pay such taxes to the internal revenue officer with whom the return is filed at the fixed time and place. The sections of the Internal Revenue Code imposed a duty on Drefke to file tax returns and pay the . . . tax, a duty which he chose to ignore." United States v. Drefke, 707 F.2d 978, 981 (8 th Cir. 1983).

Relevant Case Law:
United States v. Bressler, 772 F.2d 287, 291 (7 th Cir. 1985) - The court upheld Bressler's conviction for tax evasion, noting, "[he] has refused to file income tax returns and pay the amounts due not because he misunderstands the law, but because he disagrees with it . . . . [O]ne who refuses to file income tax returns and pay the tax owing is subject to prosecution, even though the tax protester believes the laws requiring the filing of income tax returns and the payment of income tax are unconstitutional."

Schiff v. United States, 919 F.2d 830, 833 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1238 (1991) - The court rejected Schiff's arguments as meritless and upheld imposition of the civil fraud penalty, stating "[t]he frivolous nature of this appeal is perhaps best illustrated by our conclusion that Schiff is precisely the sort of taxpayer upon whom a fraud penalty for failure to pay income taxes should be imposed."

Packard v. United States, 7 F. Supp. 2d 143, 145 (D. Conn. 1998) - The court dismissed Packard's refund suit for recovery of penalties for failure to pay income tax and failure to pay estimated taxes where the taxpayer contested the obligation to pay taxes on religious grounds, noting that "the ability of the Government to function could be impaired if persons could refuse to pay taxes because they disagreed with the Government's use of tax revenues."

United States v. Gerads, 999 F.2d 1255, 1256 (8 th Cir. 1993) - The court stated that "[taxpayers'] claim that payment of federal income tax is voluntary clearly lacks substance" and imposed sanctions in the amount of $1,500 "for bringing this frivolous appeal based on discredited, tax-protestor arguments."


55 posted on 09/02/2003 4:19:28 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: UbIwerks
"Since the non response of the IRS proves Mrs. Kuglin correct"

She may be 'correct' in that the IRS owed her a response to her letter. But Ms. Kuglin will end up paying the taxes, along with interest and penalties. All she really ended up doing was costing herself more money and, maybe, getting a few minutes of fame.

92 posted on 09/03/2003 12:47:27 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: UbIwerks
The question is who is liable for the tax -- not this tax imposed nonsense.

Do you earn taxable income? If yes, you are liable for the tax.

What is taxable income? It is gross income minus those deductions authorized in Title 26 of the US Code.

What is gross income? It is all revenues, including wages, salaries, tips, interest, dividends, et cetera.

97 posted on 09/03/2003 12:58:09 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: UbIwerks
We pay the taxes and those taxes goes around the world, for boondoggles for our honorable Senators and Congressmen; for pork barrel projects. To fight some honorable wars and to send our hard earned dollars to countries that are suppose to help the poor, but end up in the pockets of corrupt governments.

When you think of it, if 50 million of us decided not to pay taxes, what could they do to us; put us in jail, home chain us, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
222 posted on 09/13/2003 11:40:57 AM PDT by DearAbby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson