Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gays and the GOP
NEWS WEEK ^ | July 3, 2001 | Arlene Getz

Posted on 09/01/2003 11:22:11 AM PDT by GrandMoM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
....please read remaining part of the article, I was forced to excerpt and some of most important points were further into the article!!!!!
1 posted on 09/01/2003 11:22:12 AM PDT by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
It should be a non-issue. As long as they understand that "rights" that are based on one's behavior is counter to the conservative platform.
2 posted on 09/01/2003 11:25:14 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (This tag line has been intentionally left blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM; scripter; *Homosexual Agenda; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Bump and ping. An older article, but it's a good one that I haven't seen before. Thanks for posting!

Scripter will be off line occasionally between now and the middle of September. I've agreed to help him out by running his homosexual agenda ping list.

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links
Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe to or unsubscribe from scripter's homosexual agenda ping list. If you wish to be added to the list in scripter's absence, please FReepmail me.

3 posted on 09/01/2003 11:29:30 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Space for homosexuals? Sure. Space for the homosexual agenda? Not a prayer in Hell.
4 posted on 09/01/2003 11:30:53 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Arafat must go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
hey! Plenty of room in the republican party for everyone...
except constitutional conservatives.

Nobody wants those pesky folks around.
5 posted on 09/01/2003 11:38:56 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I think the bulk of the article told of the different organizations trying to infiltrate the Republican party. The agenda is already affecting the party. For this reason, I am opposed to any "out of the closet" gays participating.
6 posted on 09/01/2003 11:41:22 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Is there room for gays inside the Republicans' Big Tent?

Is there room for Christian Conservatives? A lot of us are beginning to wonder. You can't own EVERY voting bloc. It makes sense not to alienate a PROVEN bloc in pursuit of another hostile one.

7 posted on 09/01/2003 11:44:12 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Well, on the national level, homosexuality should be a non-issue. It simply isn't relevant to federal policy - this is State territory all the way. Let the states decide!
8 posted on 09/01/2003 11:51:37 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Arafat must go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
What important points? That Arlene Getz is in the wrong business and would more properly be employed as a defense attorney? That Allen Simpson has gone around the bend after spending so many years at the kennedy School?
This was just sad.
9 posted on 09/01/2003 11:59:16 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
NO!
10 posted on 09/01/2003 11:59:39 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
"Allan K. Simpson: I don’t think there’s anyone in America [who] doesn’t have someone close to them who’s part of the gay or lesbian population."

Unless there's some family member who's putting on a really good act, I do not have anyone close to me 'who is part of the gay or lesbian population'. I don't think this 'alternate lifestyle' thing is quite as prevalent as we've been led to believe.
11 posted on 09/01/2003 12:00:36 PM PDT by Maria S ("..I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end" Uday H.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
. Are you saying that because they’ll back George W. Bush in 2004 whatever happens, he can start reaching out to moderates like those represented by the RUC.

I’m not saying that at all. I’m just saying that I think there’s less chance this time of a flight of those people from the presidential race on the basis of their “agenda.” They know that George W. Bush is listening to them.

12 posted on 09/01/2003 12:02:55 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
The day that the Homosexuals are included is the day I stop voting Republican. That just about sums it up for me!!
13 posted on 09/01/2003 12:19:25 PM PDT by Winston Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
The agenda has spoiled it for all of them. I feel sorry for the ones that are honestly not pushing the agenda, but I must oppose any special rights or privileges for homosexuals. Period. And to tell the truth, they are generally such forked tongue liars that I would have trouble believing one who said he WASN'T pushing the agenda.
14 posted on 09/01/2003 12:25:56 PM PDT by johnb838 (Deconstruct the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
I agree with you on this. I have no homosexual famiy members either. People are exaggerating.
15 posted on 09/01/2003 12:32:00 PM PDT by bluebunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lemondropkid56
pardon, family
16 posted on 09/01/2003 12:32:41 PM PDT by bluebunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
I would have trouble believing one who said he WASN'T pushing the agenda.

....funny thing is, I have never heard or read about any one homosexual or one of their organizations say that the weren't part of the agenda.

17 posted on 09/01/2003 12:33:53 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Thanks for occasionally reposting these years-old articles ... its important to keep them in the news.
18 posted on 09/01/2003 12:37:30 PM PDT by Camber-G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Camber-G
Thanks for occasionally reposting these years-old articles ... its important to keep them in the news. ....I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic, or not, but my reason for posting the 2 year article is, that I feel that in that time they ,our government (R&D'S) have become much more accepting of the gay agenda's issues!
19 posted on 09/01/2003 12:45:19 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lemondropkid56
People are exaggerating.

....time to wake up!!
....read post #3

20 posted on 09/01/2003 12:57:23 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson