[Timeout]

I disagree. I think his postion is clear:

1) He believes Iraq will be a failure ala Vietnam.
2) Therefore, turn all responsibility over to the U.N. (which of course GUARANTEES failure) so that the collapse of the country can be blamed on the "former" administration.
3) Protecting American soldiers is the main objective...unfortunately this also assures failure.

In a thumbnail, Kerry would turn the entire Iraq mission over to the U.N. and wash his hands of it. For this he would win plaudits from his party and the media: "He's mended international relations!".

Then he would turn his attention to domestic affairs, as if we can have a successful economy under terrorist threat.

[skinkinthegrass]

I disagree. I think his postion is clear:...Then he would turn his attention to domestic affairs, as if we can have a successful economy under terrorist threat.

Points taken..."DemocRATS making sure Marxists/Terrorist are safe throughtout the World."

[skinkinthegrass]

I disagree. I think his postion is clear:...Then he would turn his attention to domestic affairs, as if we can have a successful economy under terrorist threat.

Points taken..."DemocRATS making sure Marxists/Terrorist are safe throughtout the World."

[skinkinthegrass]

I disagree. I think his postion is clear:...Then he would turn his attention to domestic affairs, as if we can have a successful economy under terrorist threat.

Points taken..."DemocRATS making sure Marxists/Terrorist are safe throughtout the World."

[Peach]

Re your take on Kerry - I guess that's about it. You were able to wade through the BS far better than I could.

And re your last statement - hopefully the voting public will understand just what you said - without a strong anti-terrorism policy in this country - we need not worry about ANY domestic programs.