Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
Tim: What if France, Germany, et al demand that we SHARE administration of Iraq...they want part of those oil contracts, construction, they want part of the government...if they demand that, what would you do.

Kerry: We should SHARE...SHARE....SHARE. We could leave an American commander in charge of American troops.
________________________________________

Well, Mr. French-looking candidate, does that mean you would allow U.N. control of OTHER troops? Divided leadership?!

Not only that, he keeps saying the No. 1 goal is to protect American troops. Well, we all want that, but it's not the main objective. The main objectives are to defeat the enemy and reconstruct the country.

He's not helping himself here.
13 posted on 08/31/2003 6:17:38 AM PDT by Timeout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Timeout
His message is so unclear, I cannot figure it out. I'm not a rocket scientist, but can generally figure out political positions and I honestly cannot tell what position he takes on Iraq in terms of what he'd do differently.
15 posted on 08/31/2003 6:18:49 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Timeout
So the butler from the Addams Family thinks that it's the fault of GWBush that soldiers are getting killed and that if the UN were in charge, and that's what he is inferring but to coy to come out and say it, no soldiers would die.

I have yet to hear a serious democrat, they all put forth these cotton candy ideas that are a thin as a saltine. With Kerry, it's as if he was actively fighting AGAINST the US in Vietnam and woould have preferred that we totally lost instead of fight. He is a disgusting person. He is devoid of any leadership qualities. Maybe he should learn how to sigh like Big Al. CHirac and Schroeder would love Kerry, they could lie to his face and he'd do not a thing about it.

62 posted on 08/31/2003 7:31:20 AM PDT by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Timeout
Not only that, he keeps saying the No. 1 goal is to protect American troops. Well, we all want that, but it's not the main objective. The main objectives are to defeat the enemy and reconstruct the country.

Exactly. What a pompous a$$. For all his "nuancing," he is incredibly obvious... which comes from his arrogance; subtlety is wasted on the little people. Let them eat catsup.

86 posted on 08/31/2003 8:36:03 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson