Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DB
If it was delivered to the court as requested but the court's staff failed to get it to the judge then how is that McClintock's fault?

It should have been at court with the attorneys AND submitted with the briefs. It is unimaginable that pertinent information like that would be not be included in the briefs. The court had to request it? That's nuts. That in itself probably convinced the judge that McClintock had made previous fatal errors in the candidate's submission of paperwork.

It is also unimaginable that McClintock did not know the ramifications of not agreeing to adhere to the campaign spending limits. That's what caused the whole problem.

He's not well organized or well versed on campaign law.

52 posted on 08/30/2003 6:59:25 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich
Proof of when it was delivered/rejected by the secretary's office may have had to come from the secretary's office and not McClintock's people.
58 posted on 08/30/2003 7:10:33 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson