Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: risk
The article also says there is no provision in the law allowing for amended filings, and that when he went to court challenging that, he failed to provide the court with documentation that he had made an amended, timely filing.

OK, maybe he did file on time? But, why would go to court totally unprepared? Hmmm... I got it, "Let's go to court, but not bring any evidence. We hate to confuse the court with facts."

I am still concern about his disillusion of grandeur in checking that box.

22 posted on 08/30/2003 5:08:21 AM PDT by BushCountry (To the last, I will grapple with Democrats. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at Liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: BushCountry
I am still concern about his disillusion of grandeur in checking that box.

That doesn't bother me; I could see doing that as a matter of principle -- if there were no other consequences. But that law has been in place for three years. How can he claim not to have known about it?

24 posted on 08/30/2003 5:13:13 AM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: BushCountry
I would need evidence of a pattern to make a comment like that.
25 posted on 08/30/2003 5:14:21 AM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson