Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carbon14
This is a goof and a no-brainer, but I seriously doubt anyone is going to make up their mind about who to vote for based on what they read in an "offical recall election voter guide."

If McClintok is petty enough to sue about this, I am disappointed. Hell, it's not like they are trying to keep his name off the ballot, is it?

Conservative contempt should be reserved for cases like New Jersey where in total violation of the established rules, the Torch bugged out and another name was substituted well PAST the deadline.

Nobody should be complaining because the rules are being FOLLOWED. Lord knows that happens seldom enough as it is.
14 posted on 08/30/2003 4:44:57 AM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ronin
If McClintok is petty enough to sue about this, I am disappointed. Hell, it's not like they are trying to keep his name off the ballot, is it?

Doesnt this voter guide also tell the potential voter WHERE on the ballot McClintock's name will be placed to help the voter find it? If true, McClintock may have really shot himself in the foot. Without this knowledge, some voters may get frustrated and vote for someone else or fail to vote on part 2. At the least this will require McBlinky to have to prepare a separate piece of his own to mail out to potential voters.

54 posted on 08/30/2003 7:00:40 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson