Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RS
Tom McClintock hasn't reverted to Democrat tactics.

McClintock may have made a mistake, but he immediately turned around and rectified the problem, by complying with the law. It was the liberal establishment of California who was unwilling to be give McClintock an opportunity to correct this oversight. McClintock received NO pass from anyone in the California governing establishment.

>>>Anyone who does not march in lock-step with OUR guy is to be attacked ?

We're talking about standing up to unfair treatment of a conservative. Truth is, I would be willing to give any candidate, an opportunity to rectify such an insignificant oversight.

I really don't understand your reluctance to cut Tom McClintock some slack on this issue. After all, don't all FReepers want conservatism to triumph over liberalism? Why do you take sides with California's liberal governing establishment on this issue?

130 posted on 08/30/2003 9:04:34 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man
"I really don't understand your reluctance to cut Tom McClintock some slack on this issue."

He can have all of my slack he needs - But my slack will not do him any good when no voter sees his name in the pamphlet.
Lets hope he can get a little traffic out of reporters who happen to mention that he is not in there.

" The election pamphlets are on the way, and the one candidate who is not listed is Tom McClintock..."

Maybe a campaign saying something like " dont carry the whole thing to the polls, simply write my name on the cover and tear it off"

133 posted on 08/31/2003 8:53:18 AM PDT by RS (nc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson