To: RS
>>>I not only read the article, but the law regarding it, which from you obviously had not from your abrupt change from the 1st amendment defence to equal protection.I haven't changed my tune. The way I read it, it's an infringement on McClintock's first amendment right of free speech and his right to equal treatment under law.
I can't think of a good reason why any conservative would deny another conservative his rights under law and condone the outrageous behavior of California's liberal Democratic majority.
To: Reagan Man
"I can't think of a good reason why any conservative would deny another conservative his rights under law and condone the outrageous behavior of California's liberal Democratic majority."
Just because you "can't think of a good reason" dosen't mean that there is not one that you don't WANT to see.
Both the Republicans and the Democrats in this race realize that to give one candidate a special priviledge based on stupidity is against the law, common sense, and would set a precedent that none of them wants.
Do you seriously want to use as a basis of argument what McClintock's INTENT was as he submitted his paperwork rather then what he marked ?
( thank God the applications are not in punch card format )
126 posted on
08/30/2003 8:00:43 PM PDT by
RS
(nc)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson