Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grando Calrissian
No where have I said it has no benefits.
117 posted on 08/29/2003 12:33:27 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: Phantom Lord
Apologies. Mentally substituted revenues for benefits.

In the end, that's the central argument regarding the construction of any major public structure like a stadium, Increased Tax Revenues v. Benefits to the City. Fortunately, more cities and teams are working out alternate deals when it comes to new stadium construction. Pacific Bell Park was financed privately, and the new baseball parks in St. Louis and Boston will be more privately financed than publically, which is definitely a step in the right direction. Any city that would 100% finance and build a stadium for a professional sports franchise is foolish.

123 posted on 08/29/2003 12:39:47 PM PDT by Grando Calrissian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson