No. You are the one asserting that the presence of a stone in a state building somehow is a law establishing a religion.
Wrong. I never said such a thing in any of my posts.
With all due respect, it is a ridiculous claim.
I'm merely asking which one. We will get to the other questions once you can name a religion that can be established by said stone.
No. You first need to go back and review my posts to see what my argument really was.
You've obviously lost track of the dialogue.
Wrong. I never said such a thing in any of my posts.
Isn't the following your statement?
The law Judge Moore defied was one dictating that NO ONE has the right to use the Govt to impose their religion on others.