Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
I know you didn't just say that I must arrive at the current interpretation or I'm reading the document wrong. Please tell me you didn't say that.

I didn't say that. If you can't read English, then I would suggest not arguing legal interpretations with me.

I said that if an interpretation of an otherwise constitutional state constitution creates a conflict with a specifc clause in the US Constitution, then the interpretation in question is not correct.

211 posted on 08/29/2003 10:23:33 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
If an interpretation conflicts with the USConst then the interp is not correct.

Therefore, it cannot be true that merely acknowledging Almighty God is not the same as establishing a religion.
214 posted on 08/29/2003 10:27:38 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson