Skip to comments.
Ministers Who Say Judge Moore Acted Improperly Need To Tear Daniel Six Out Of Their Bibles!
Food For Thought From The Chuck Wagon ^
| Aug 29, 2003
| Chuck Baldwin
Posted on 08/28/2003 8:50:50 PM PDT by xzins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-254 next last
To: nmh
I've had my head buried in the sand for 52 years?
81
posted on
08/28/2003 10:24:28 PM PDT
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: xzins
You know there were a lot of politically incorrect mascots when I was growing up. I know a lot of schools have had to change mascots because they "offended" the INDIANS. There was one school that I recall that had a mascot of the CRUSADERS and the school emblem had a 12th century crusader complete with a sword and a CROSS on the shield and on the battle uniform. I believe they even had shields with crosses on their football helmets. Can you imagine that today?
Geez back then nobody complained at all. My wife went to a school whose mascot was "The Saints" and their school theme song was "When the saints go marching in."
It was an innocent time and nobody complained. Now everyone is offended at everything.
82
posted on
08/28/2003 10:26:26 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(Milquetoast Q. Whitebread is alive!)
To: nmh
That is what is being suggested in Alabama. G-d must be removed.
83
posted on
08/28/2003 10:28:31 PM PDT
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: P-Marlowe
It was an innocent time and nobody complained. Now everyone is offended at everything.
Yep, wouldn't it be nice if everyone grew up and realized there are a lot of differences out there and it's ok?
They're solution is to "hide" the differences so no one will be offended at the world that is actually full of differences.
Our solution is to be open about the differences and just let everyone act out their differences. (Elsewhere known as 'freedom.')
But you gotta be a secure with yourself adult to let a buddhist pray on a street corner or a judge post a 10C display.
84
posted on
08/28/2003 10:31:00 PM PDT
by
xzins
(In the Beginning was the Word)
To: nmh
You mean like Judge Moore's oath of office?
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and truthfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
85
posted on
08/28/2003 10:36:31 PM PDT
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: takenoprisoner
I was thinking about President Bush with his hand on the Bible swearing into office. But I'll certainly accept the swearing in of a Judge - "so help me God".
86
posted on
08/28/2003 10:43:23 PM PDT
by
nmh
To: takenoprisoner
I respect Judge Moore since he did nothing illegal. It's the anti-god people trying to distort the entire situation do God can be put in a back room.
Me thinks that these opponents hate ANY kind of authority much less the Authority over all of us.
87
posted on
08/28/2003 10:46:06 PM PDT
by
nmh
To: nmh
I was not aware the presidential oath required the president to swear "so help me God" like others do.
88
posted on
08/28/2003 10:46:21 PM PDT
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: xzins
I have occasion to be in front of a Buddhist Judge. His office is used to discuss cases and is a public place. He has the room decorated with Buddhist stuff and he has this budhist music and chanting on a CD playing softly in the background along with pictures with buddhist sayings on them and he's got his ying and yang stuff everyhwere. It is like entering into a buddhist temple to do business.
As a Christian I am not the least bit offended. I respect his right to decorate his office and his chambers in any way that suits him. I am also cognizant of the fact that I'd better not tell any Buddhist jokes in his presence. Not because I can't. But because I am smart enough not to.
89
posted on
08/28/2003 10:46:55 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(Milquetoast Q. Whitebread is alive!)
To: nmh
The "in God we trust" on our money ain't allah.
90
posted on
08/28/2003 10:48:41 PM PDT
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: P-Marlowe
Confusious asks why does woman fly upside down?
91
posted on
08/28/2003 10:51:27 PM PDT
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: All
Confusious asks, why does the price of gas go up when an oil man is president?
92
posted on
08/28/2003 10:59:33 PM PDT
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: xzins
IMHO, if any religion is being promoted by this entire affair it is either agnosticism or atheism.
With respect to Christianity, the entire affair is a Catch-22. The Church Age surpasses the Mosaic Law. As a believer in Christ, it's a bit foolish to get too miffed over the entire issue as it tends to communicate the wrong news to those not yet informed of the Gospel. Conversely, implications that the 10 Commandments have no place in jurisprudence is equally as absurd.
I suspect the entire affair is like so many satanicly contrived arguments reminescent of the Clinton years. If one falls for advocating either side of the argument, one has already missed more important issues.
93
posted on
08/29/2003 4:17:31 AM PDT
by
Cvengr
(0:^))
To: Woahhs
That is rather the point isn't it. They are spanking your kids without authority and totally outside the limits of their authority.
A federal judge raised taxes, just as they did in the 60's to pay for busing, to fund a project he favors. There is not a dimes worth of difference between "law" and "judicial edict". Both have the same effect.
To: savedbygrace
A judge's order is legally binding, enforced by the police power of the state, making it de facto law. If it were not so, we could ignore judge's orders at our pleasure, and we would descend into chaos.
To: microgood
So if a judge ordered you to jump off a cliff you would do it.False analogy. Nice red herring.
To: Thane_Banquo
Court orders are not laws, they are court orders.I fthey were laws Judges would issue 'laws' not court orders.
Of course the federales see no difference because since they actually think they, rather than Moses, are the law-givers.
97
posted on
08/29/2003 6:38:27 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: AndrewC
Toxic and pharisaic Evangelicalism, for starters.
98
posted on
08/29/2003 6:39:52 AM PDT
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(and yes, all that sobbing and prostration over Roy's Rock was pharisaic as well as idolatrous)
To: xzins
The last generation that will see the end of this age are the people who will witness the rebuilding of the temple. The cornerstone is ready to be put into place. Sit back it won't be long now.
99
posted on
08/29/2003 6:41:47 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
To: jwalsh07
Court orders are not laws, they are court orders.I fthey were laws Judges would issue 'laws' not court orders.Now you're arguing semantics.
Of course the federales see no difference because since they actually think they, rather than Moses, are the law-givers.
What is it the Bible says about obeying the ruling authorities? Further, are you arguing that court orders shouldn't be legally binding? Do you honestly want to live in a nation where we can ignore any court order simply because we don't agree with it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-254 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson