Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jewish and Christian leaders launch countermissionary campaign [Fighting "Jews for Jesus" people]
Jerusalem Post ^ | Aug. 27, 2003

Posted on 08/27/2003 2:00:45 PM PDT by yonif

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-302 next last
To: Yehuda
"I have tossed them out of a shul as well... on their heads."

Anyone have the number for who prosecutes religious hate crimes in Yehuda's neighborhood?
261 posted on 08/28/2003 1:57:50 PM PDT by ZviTheWise (Silence=Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

Comment #262 Removed by Moderator

Comment #263 Removed by Moderator

Comment #264 Removed by Moderator

To: Buggman
Frankly, I think we need to elimiate that kind of sloppy thinking in any honest dialogue about religion. The "all roads lead to God" approach sounds concillatory, but it's ultimately idiotic. While it is possible that God could make leeway for those who are honestly mistaken (though I personally don't believe this to be true for a variety of reasons that I don't want to get into right now), if we're really serious about loving Him, we should be prepared to constantly re-examine our beliefs about how He relates to us and how we are to relate to Him. To do less, to stifle the discussion with vague "oh, it doesn't matter" statements, dishonors God by making our own comfort a god before Him.

With this paragraph, you betray the sugar coating of the rest of your post. If you are unable to accept the idea that that which leads you to God is right for you, while that which leads you away from God is wrong for you, then there is no basis for further discussion on this topic between us.

You are free to believe what you wish, and I am free to believe what I wish. God gave us this power, and no man may take it away. If that troubles you, it is your problem, not mine, although I hope you may learn to overcome that stumbling block someday. I assure you that such thinking will not bring you closer to God. As a famous man once wisely observed, "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?" (Matthew 7:3)

I also hope you will understand why I refuse to accept the strawmen you are offering me. I have said what I have said, and stand by it. Am I guilty of sloppy thinking? Perhaps. If you accept the notion that talking to God is sloppy thinking, then most certainly I am guilty of it.

The truth is that God is everywhere, and when I speak of "turning to God" or "turning away from God" I am really referring to the process by which we, as individuals, come to relate to and understand God or ignore Him. Although God is vast and magnificent beyond our understanding, it is still incredibly easy to communicate with God and listen to what He has to say. Any system of belief which opposes direct communication between you and God is false, hurtful and to be avoided at all costs.

If your statements and inquiries are motivated by genuine love and concern, then more power to you. But this is not what I sense. Rather I sense judgment and a need to establish who between us is right or wrong on a topic where such a concept is relevant only between each of us and God.

If your intent is to establish whether or not you are right or I am wrong, then you are wasting your time. What matters is not what is between you and me, but what is between each of us and God.

If you can accept that, then there is no need for us to disagree at all.

265 posted on 08/28/2003 3:11:28 PM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
You have sympathy for the rapist Edomites?

I don't know, should I?

266 posted on 08/28/2003 3:11:44 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole; A.J.Armitage
As much as I enjoy semantics and arguments based on them, I hope you can understand my reluctance to spend a lot of time arguing over the various definitions of "Jew" and "Jewish". The fact is that there are many, they are context-sensitive, and many of them are not even true (such as "Jewish race"). Accept it for what it is.

And no A.J., I was not calling you a racist. Most of that post was written not only to address your statement, but that of many others on the thread as well, including those of "racists". :^)

The takeaway from my position is that arguing over what a Jew is, without clearly defining what one means by "Jew" is a waste of time.

267 posted on 08/28/2003 3:24:41 PM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Are you sure that you want to take such a stance against Christians who stand firmly behind Israel? That's what you are doing. Your silence on athetist Jews and erasure of Messianic Jews is anti-Christian bigotry. Point blank.

I think we have a failure to communicate. I have nothing against Christians. I count many as good friends. I welcome their support for Israel. Many live there and call it their home. It is only that Jewish law is clear on the treatment of a Jew who publicly renounces his faith for another. A Jew who converts to any other religion, including Christianity is an apostate. They have given up their status a Jew. A "messianic Jew" is an oxymoron. It is like kosher pork. They are either Christian or Jew.

They cannot be both. To say otherwise is a bald faced lie. Point blank.

268 posted on 08/28/2003 3:25:50 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: lews
The people that get so upset about Jews for Jesus claim that anyone recognizing Jesus Christ as the Messiah is no longer Jewish. Funny, I've never heard them say that an atheistic Jew (no God) is no longer Jewish.
269 posted on 08/28/2003 3:35:09 PM PDT by Binghamton_native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
"By the way, how about the Jews starting some missionary work of their own?"

Mel Brooks has done some great send-ups on this topic, but there are very good reasons why Jews don't tend to go door-to-door (although the Lubavitchers are something else, aren't they?).

This would probably make the most sense in Israel, since (my understanding at least) it IS intended to be a Jewish state for the Jewish homeland.

Don't look for Jews to be handing out tracts and trying to talk their way into your home anytime soon, though. ;^)

270 posted on 08/28/2003 3:40:36 PM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
They are either Christian or Jew.

I see. Well, the atheist Jew can be glad that he or she is still considered Jewish, Christian be damned. The atheist Jew gets the benefit of the doubt. The ethnic Jew who is a Christian doesn't.

Beam me up, Scottie.


271 posted on 08/28/2003 3:56:51 PM PDT by rdb3 (They've read all the books but they can't find the answers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Being a cubicle captive I have not read the whole thread. But, was Jesus not a practicing Jew and a Rabbi? Were those who followed him not practicing Jews who believed Jesus was the promised massiah? Is pointing out that the Massiah has already come and the Jews who still deny it could benefit from another look at it, intimidation? Jews for Jesus is not a name I would have chosen, but it is only a name. They have only to read Matthew, Mark, Luke & John. That is where they will find the important difference between Judiasim and Christianity. None of it is a secret. None of it means to harm or intimidate. It is a message of love, salvation and hope. Or is it that in unity is the Jew's strength and to accept Jesus is threatening to their system of life?
272 posted on 08/28/2003 3:57:43 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts (I agree with Dick Morris. Off with their heads! Let's start with the Clintons, all three of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
"Christianity is not a branch of Judaism "

For that statement alone....she should be shamed and ridiculed as an ass.

...where angels fear to tread.

You may wish to be more circumspect about singling people out for ridicule.

273 posted on 08/28/2003 3:58:24 PM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
"But, was Jesus not a practicing Jew and a Rabbi?"

He may very well have been a "practicing Jew", up to a point, it seems. But as far as I know, there is no record of Jesus having ever been ordained as a rabbi.

There are some interesting albeit unsubstantiated theories, however, that he may have been an Essene scholar, and possibly given that title by the Essenes. But I have seen nothing other than provocative speculation on the topic.

274 posted on 08/28/2003 4:20:06 PM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The atheist Jew gets the benefit of the doubt. The ethnic Jew who is a Christian doesn't.

I wanted to be clear on this answer and actually took the trouble to ask someone smarter than myself about it (which is not hard to find, lol).

If you are talking about Jewish law, the law treats them identically. Denial of G-d is different than idolotry. They're different sins, however, they are not treated differently. Supposedly. If you are talking about secular Jews, who operate with their own logic and emotion, yes IMHO they are treated differently.

275 posted on 08/28/2003 5:56:23 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
If you had read the entire page you quoted, http://www.interfaithfamily.com/article/issue21/mgeller.html you would have found this sentence: "Conservative Judaism has largely ignored this practice in the past, but recently has begun to reevaluate its silence in this area and to consider the spiritual implications of mikvah immersion for human sexuality and for women." IE, the mikvah ritual has not been followed by mainstream Judaism for a while.

So what? Christianity was around a long time before Liberal, Conservative, and Orthodox Judaism split. Like over a thousand years before.

Curious though that *i* didn't mention mikvah, you did. I didn't claim to be an expert on mikvah, you did. Apparently I prefer my herring pickled with onions, and you prefer yours red. :)

That's a stawman. I never claimed to be an "expert" on the mikva. You made a specific claim -- that baptism derives from pagan practices. I countered that claim by pointing out the Jewish practice it actually derives from. All I ever claimed to know is the background of the ordinance of baptism, and I do know it.

276 posted on 08/28/2003 6:09:10 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
"Do you need prosecuting?"

Does Yehuda condone and practice religious violence? Wait, we already know the answer... YES!

277 posted on 08/28/2003 6:55:54 PM PDT by ZviTheWise (Silence=Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

Comment #278 Removed by Moderator

Comment #279 Removed by Moderator

To: Imal
"....But to command ME how to approach God is wrong, and if you were to condemn me because I choose to stand before God as a Jew, it would be evil.".....

You missed the point of what I said ENTIRELY! I didn't say any of this, GOD DID! You condemn yourself, not me. I have nothing to do with it. If Hell is not for non-believers, who is it for? I'm not telling anyone what to do, I'm just doing what GOD says to do. If you CHOOSE to rebel against GOD, that's not my concern. I still want the Holy Spirit to call you, but He is responsible to save who He will. It's not my responsibility. Jesus explained the Scriptures to the Synagouge's and they made their choices. All the Scriptures told of the coming of Jesus. He is seen in all the verses. Don't be mad at me and my brothers, God is who you are angry at. As Christians we have 1 job; spread the Gospel. We are ordered to do that. You still have your will. We won't ever take that from you, nor could I. When you come to Jesus, you give up your will for His. As long as you rebel and keep your will, you cannot be doing God's will. That's what it's been about since Adam and Eve. It's not that complicated.

I just never understand why people get so angry when God is talked about. They act like He is some namby pamby, "can't we all just get along", God. He destroyed Sodom for their sin, He destroyed everyone on Earth, save 8 people, for their sin, He has put the Jews in slavery many times to punish His people, Why do people believe they can mock His Son's sacrifice and get away with it? Salvation is a free gift. I don't give it, He does. I don't judge you, He will. Being a "good person" won't get you there. That is the problem with all religions that have no Savior. You will be judged on your works and nobody is without sin. Your religion teaches you to shed blood for forgiveness of sin. Whoose blood have you shed lately? Do you take goats down to the Synagouge, or is that old fashion? Where does it say you should stop the Law of God? Read Josepheus and see that miracles stoped happening at the Temple when Jesus died. People were waiting and waiting for the crimson thread to turn white, it didn't. Did the Glory of God decend on the Temple to show their sin was forgiven one more time? No, it stopped. There was no need for sacrifice after the Supreme Sacrifice, once for all. There was a period of about 30-35 years with no miracles commented about in his writings.

You say God loves "your" people. Are there NO Jews in Hell? There are Jews that are atheists. Are they saved also by heritage? You are correct that God loves all people, That why His Son died for their sins. You must believe that to accept the free gift. If you don't, you are self rightious and will be judged accordingly. You must reach the standard Jesus set to get in heaven. Good luck to you and Shalom.

280 posted on 08/28/2003 9:35:05 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-302 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson