To: Those_Crazy_Liberals
Okay. Now this is a real discussion. :-)
First of all, I need to know why you think McClintock is a loser. Then I can work with the question.
And not a bunch of emotional stuff, either. Clear, solid reasons.
56 posted on
08/26/2003 9:11:36 PM PDT by
Cathryn Crawford
(Ummm, moron. It's not free. It was paid for with taxes.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
MClintock has no appeal to moderates and independents.
57 posted on
08/26/2003 9:12:16 PM PDT by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: Cathryn Crawford
"First of all, I need to know why you think McClintock is a loser."
Um. . . because he lost a statewide election not a year ago.
60 posted on
08/26/2003 9:13:20 PM PDT by
Those_Crazy_Liberals
(Ronaldus Magnus he's our man . . . If he can't do it, no one can.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
First of all, I need to know why you think McClintock is a loser.
Oh let me! Let me! Again, this is not simply a PRIMARY, this is a two-fold election, a Recall and Replacement. The majority of the voters have to be motivated enough FIRST to remove Davis. In order to do that, they need a replacement that they will find will do the job (fix the economy of CA) and best represent them in the Governor's Mansion.
Bustamante is in there ONLY because Arnold can win and the Dems need a backup punter. Heck, if Arnold wasn't running, I'd almost take a bet that Davis would keep his job and serve out his term.
83 posted on
08/26/2003 9:28:10 PM PDT by
Registered
(Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson