Your argument was that SB 1301 (Reproductive Privacy Act) was active and Arnold would have to make a decision whether to sign it or not. You posted a link to an out-of-date article. SB 1301 was signed by Gray a year ago. Regardless, even that bill had no effect on Roe V. Wade. It was a political move choreographed to time with last year's gubenatorial election to remind the California public that a vote for Gray was a vote for a woman's right to choose as opposed to "anti-choice Simon." End of story. If you want to engage in what-ifs, have at it. They simply don't exist and your questions aren't logical.
False. Quoteless, naturally.