To: Roscoe
hypotheticals:
Arnold is NOT yet governor, so you don't KNOW what he will or won't sign. You are presuming to know what he will and will not sign. Maybe if he got a call from McC in the state senate, and Bush about vetoing it AFTER he was elected... he would do just that. Maybe not.
YOU cannot possibly KNOW.
It is patently dishonest to imply that you do.
Furthermore that law has not been signed yet... so it's not even a law... once again, NOT a real situation... your twin hypotheticals, "if it passes" and "he will sign it." Neither established.
I will buy a new dictionary, if you stop using the same old "straw man" arguments based on unknowable hypotheticals as your only debate and discussion approaches.
192 posted on
08/26/2003 2:22:40 PM PDT by
Robert_Paulson2
(We need a new war... the *--WAR on GLUTTONY--* to save America...)
To: Robert_Paulson2
hypotheticals No, DoughtyOne parroted the old falsehood that abortion didn't involve state government. He was provided with a recent actual counterexample right here in California and he wilted.
Arnold is NOT yet governor, so you don't KNOW what he will or won't sign.
On Fox News's "O'Reilly Factor," on Aug. 16, 2000, Schwarzenegger described himself as "extremely liberal" on social issues, and said: "I'm for choice. The women should have the choice. The women should decide what they want to do with their bodies. I'm all for that."
Was he lying again?
195 posted on
08/26/2003 2:28:05 PM PDT by
Roscoe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson