To: .cnI redruM; SAMWolf; archy; snippy_about_it; Samwise; AntiJen; radu; bentfeather
General Shinseki had been warned about these 'problems' long before the Stryker was even built.
The problem was compounded by his decision to remove teh tracks and stick tires on it because he thought "tires are more manueverable".
He's never been stuck in Fort Drum sand up to his axles while SP howitzers and tanks slide on by with a grinand a wave....
While an intrigueing idea, the Stryker has been hawked to the buyers as a tank replacement.
God willing, this will all be fixed.
Hopefully with General 'Pop-a-Quaalude' Shinseki getting cashiered out for willfully endangering the lives of soldiers.
43 posted on
08/26/2003 8:31:59 AM PDT by
Darksheare
("I sense something dark." No you don't!)
To: Darksheare
"tires are more manueverable". - Until you run through a burning obstacle. Then they have a nasty tendency to warp, melt and upon occasion explode.
Shinseki has based his legacy upon an inefficient, failed piece of equipment. The IBCT is a necessary, well-designed force. It's the Stryker that needs replacing.
44 posted on
08/26/2003 8:37:10 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(Nothing Is More Vile Than A Blowhard With Halitosis! - redruM)
To: Darksheare
This does not sound like a very good idea to me. I think you hit the nail on the head. These tanks are going to be in sand where tracks are needed.
sheeeeeesh what the he$$ is the matter with his head?
To: Darksheare
IMHO the Stryker is the same kind of boondoggle as the Sgt. York.
48 posted on
08/26/2003 9:09:58 AM PDT by
SAMWolf
(Oregon - Where the Legislature keeps writing checks the taxpayers can't cover.)
To: Darksheare
Thanks for the ping Darksheare.
Shinseki should have been gotten rid of earlier and I hope someone is taking a serious look at this before putting our troops in further danger.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson