Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free trade's victims turning against Bush, GOP
The Herald Sun ^ | August 25, 2003 | associated press

Posted on 08/25/2003 2:05:47 PM PDT by snopercod

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 1,221-1,235 next last
To: ArneFufkin
I do note that a lot of the names we became so familiar with as mouth-frothing Brigaders in 1999 and 2000 have disappeared, to be replaced by people who registered in November-December 2000 - playing the role today as Bush voters/supporters who have since soured totally on the man.

They really think we're as idiotic as they are.

201 posted on 08/25/2003 6:48:12 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
#34 post very well put.
202 posted on 08/25/2003 6:49:01 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
I am not sure I support wage controls for CEO's.

Me: (slowly standing and applauding)

Wow... what a brave position for you to take there.

203 posted on 08/25/2003 6:49:10 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Proudly posting without the </sarcasm> tag for at least a few months.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Free Repbublic is wonderful, but it must be understood in the context of a pathology that occurs when bitter old men get internet access.
204 posted on 08/25/2003 6:49:54 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Jobs in many industries have fled overseas since 1993, when Congress passed the Clinton-backed North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA. About half the textile and apparel jobs that existed in 1994 are gone.

And this is all Bush's fault ??

205 posted on 08/25/2003 6:50:11 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Using government to artificially raise the price of goods isn't going to help us, it's going to lower are living standards

I guess that government interference in foreign trade being bad only applies to the US government. Every foreign government gets a pass becuase they subsidize exports to drive American industry out of teh market place so they can then exercise monoply or political power from the end result.

Now I challenged you before to rpovide some quantitative evidence that a tariff does not provide a net benefit to teh USA I have previuously provided you a link to a multiple regression analysis showing a tariff did provide a benefit net to the USA. There are others. If your statement is true about a tariff lowering teh standard of living then someone should be able to back it up with evidence.

206 posted on 08/25/2003 6:50:17 PM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
ABB. (Anyone but Bush) I was fooled once, not again. I don't like his policies on many levels. He has turned his back on America.

Nice to know you support Al Sharpton over George Bush. You are a solid conservative.

207 posted on 08/25/2003 6:50:38 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Proudly posting without the </sarcasm> tag for at least a few months.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
I don't like him pandering to people like you.

People like me?? Almost everything he has done has been against what I believe. He's hardly pandering to me!

208 posted on 08/25/2003 6:51:05 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Poobah, I think you're attributing something to me that I didn't advocate.

You were responding to my point about export taxes being illegal under the US Constitution.

I do not support tariffs on exports.

You managed to sound like you did.

Just because your unable to read and comprehend what is said, don't attempt to lie about what I wrote.

Why Poohbay, it's not like you to just give out partial information. Tariffs would be charged on imports. As for teriffs charged on exports, other nations charge tariffs on our exports all the time, some as much as 40 percent.

Knowing that you would object to tariffs on imports, I explained to you that other nations charge those on our exports to their nations all the time.

Now, if you're still not able to understand this simple concept, why don't you just suffer the humiliation of not understanding and not make a total --- out of yourself again.
 

209 posted on 08/25/2003 6:51:07 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
That's funny because I don't like him pandering to people like you.

So were you out cheerleading the big $15 billion throwaway on AIDS in Africa? That kind of money could actually go a long way to bailing out California --- and remember --- there is no cure for AIDS, that money was thrown away.

210 posted on 08/25/2003 6:51:42 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Free Repbublic is wonderful, but it must be understood in the context of a pathology that occurs when bitter old men get internet access.

Ha! I think you just came up with the new slogan for Free Republic!

211 posted on 08/25/2003 6:51:48 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: JNB

Ok, here are some figures I have dug up

http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/data.exe/cenc25/c25m01

From this table, the median price of a home in 1963 was a little over $17K

http://www.usc.edu/schools/sppd/research/casden/research/data_folder/us_fainco.pdf

From this table, the unadjusted median family income was $6,249


Now todays figures, the median family income is now $51K, and keep in mind that a far higher percentage of women work now compared to the 60s, a large majority of familes in the 60s had one income, compared to a large majority of familes having two incomes. The median price of a home in 2001 according to the table was $180K. So the ratio of housing prices to family income was around 2.8:1 in 1963, and it is now around 3.6:1. I have yet to dig up a chart of median individual income, though that will be next.
212 posted on 08/25/2003 6:51:51 PM PDT by JNB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
If your tongue can go any higher up the posterior of this administration, the president could skip his annual colon exam.
213 posted on 08/25/2003 6:51:55 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
People like me?? Almost everything he has done has been against what I believe. He's hardly pandering to me!

What do you call huge steel tariffs to prop up manufacturing jobs and massive government payments to farmers?

214 posted on 08/25/2003 6:52:19 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Proudly posting without the </sarcasm> tag for at least a few months.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
No need for sarcasm... I was born without the class envy gene.
215 posted on 08/25/2003 6:52:28 PM PDT by Jhoffa_ ("Hi, I'm Johnny Knoxville!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Well, pal, wait until you see what millions of unemployed Americans will do with your so-called "free market capitalism."

Are you going to rob me? Better bring the kevlar. Want a job? I can find something for you to do around my house if you can't think of anything someone else might want done. By the way, I call it liberty, capitalism is just a description of how it accumulates wealth.

They are going to dismantle the system because it is putting them into the poor house.

Being put there? That's an interesting way of looking at it. What do you think you are owed, and by whom? You have to earn a living, sir.

The American people are becoming poorer by shipping all of their decent jobs overseas and there will be a political upheaval whether smug name-callers like you want to admit it or not.

You can't build a wall high enough to trap capital, all you can do is lure it. High taxes and regulaton are chasing out capital, robbing me won't change that for you. After you eat what you steal from me, what will you do? Find another victim?

You see the world as a brutal game of "Monopoly" where people are run over by the free market steam roller.

No, I see it a place where opportunity must be pursued and free rides aren't guaranteed.

A nation of angry folks with plenty of time and poverty on their hands will do something about it. Count on it.

Still not scared of you. Sounds like you don't know how to create work for yourself, you need someone to provide you a job. You need us, we don't need you. Or do you expect to be the American Mugabe's henchmen? Is that what you're hinting at?

You see your fellow countrymen as pawns in your international chess game and don't have any respect or regard for their plight.

No, I see them as human beings, that have to earn their keep. I don't want you putting a gun to my head and telling me I can't trade with someone else just because they offer a better deal than you.

You would not want me to be Emperor.

Of course I don't, your fixed pie world view tries to take, not create, and expects to be provided for, not provide for themselves. I realize the world only gets better by people trading effort for effort, not compulsion.

you have no allegiance to any nation, as you have declared yourself the defender of borderless globalism.

I don't think imaginary lines should give you the right to pick my pocket.

I am no genius but a corporation employing mostly foreigners is foreign and it won't take a genius or a bureaucracy to recognize that.

So? You're the one who wants to create a bureaucracy to make that determination, as if a legion of new leeches will suddenly make us richer. Oh, it might help you keep doing what you're doing, for a little while, if you can stop me from trading freely with someone else. But that happens by making millions pay more for their goods and have lower standards of living, and you feel no shame, you feel owed.

Governments have long determined the requirements for trade and commerce with their nations.

You didn't have to pull off the mask, I had you pegged, commie.

America seems, at the moment, the only country to be the world's sucker and not demanding fair, reciprocal access to markets.

The American government does demand it, difference is they don't punish American citizens just because Japanese, etc. citizens are being punished by their government's with higher costs imposed the government.

216 posted on 08/25/2003 6:53:00 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
If your tongue can go any higher up the posterior of this administration, the president could skip his annual colon exam.

Thanks. Same for yours and Howard Dean's posterior (or whoever the DNC nominee ends up being).

217 posted on 08/25/2003 6:53:06 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Proudly posting without the </sarcasm> tag for at least a few months.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: JNB; ninenot; FITZ; A. Pole; arete; Tokhtamish
Ok, here are some figures I have dug up

http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/data.exe/cenc25/c25m01

From this table, the median price of a home in 1963 was a little over $17K

http://www.usc.edu/schools/sppd/research/casden/research/data_folder/us_fainco.pdf

From this table, the unadjusted median family income was $6,249


Now todays figures, the median family income is now $51K, and keep in mind that a far higher percentage of women work now compared to the 60s, a large majority of familes in the 60s had one income, compared to a large majority of familes having two incomes. The median price of a home in 2001 according to the table was $180K. So the ratio of housing prices to family income was around 2.8:1 in 1963, and it is now around 3.6:1. I have yet to dig up a chart of median individual income, though that will be next.
218 posted on 08/25/2003 6:54:17 PM PDT by JNB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Go back and read #123 (my post, where I responded to a proposal to exact a higher tax on overseas revenues). Then go back and read #131 (your response to my post). You either tried to defend taxing US exports, or you had a severe case of neural flatulence. Your imperfect command of the English language doesn't help others to understand your ramblings.
219 posted on 08/25/2003 6:54:31 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Never underestimate the ability of cyclical economic downtunrns

Cyclical downturns usually means lay off as assembly lines or some factories, but what we're witnessing now is the shut down of tool and die businesses, we're closing down the means of production. IT obviously didn't pan out as a replacement for manufacturing, we're closing that down too. And the entire garment industry.

You can't really believe that no jobs for Americans is a good policy.

220 posted on 08/25/2003 6:54:50 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 1,221-1,235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson