[billbears]

Why because I refuse to believe the administration without factual evidence? Because I don't believe Hussein was ever a direct and immediate threat to the safety of these United States? Iraq wasn't a threat. The 'ally' that supplied 15 of the 19 terrorists and still to this day supports terrorism worldwide, now that's a different story

[rwfromkansas]

Bush could personally take you to Saddam's WMD and you still wouldn't believe him.

[alnick]

Because I don't believe Hussein was ever a direct and immediate threat to the safety of these United States?

The administration never claimed that Iraq was a direct and imediate threat to the US, and you know that.

I don't have to remind you that the president said that we shouldn't wait until they become a direct and immediate threat. You already know that.

I have to ask myself why someone who knows that insists on repeating the lie anyway.

[Ethyl]

Why because I refuse to believe the administration without factual evidence? Because I don't believe Hussein was ever a direct and immediate threat to the safety of these United States? Iraq wasn't a threat. The 'ally' that supplied 15 of the 19 terrorists and still to this day supports terrorism worldwide, now that's a different story

I guess that you don't understand, that both wars in Afganistan and Iraq are one in the same war on terrorism! They are all involved, recently prooven with the islamofasts alquida entering Iraq, this is the final war with all of them, it is going to heat up fast, and they have access to saddam's WMDs, it could get dicey. We have to strike first and deliver the WMDs inoperable. Yea, sure the arabs are involved, all of them! They hate what we are doing in Afganistan and Iraq, we are promoting freedom, the islamofasts can't stand that and are going for their stupid little jihad stuff. We will win over the people to freedom and the stupid little jihadies will be toast with their WMDs.