Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevin Curry
I'm guessing you also thought Mr .00005% ( aka Pat Buchanan ) was a "viable" conservative candidate in 2000.
78 posted on 08/24/2003 4:36:37 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: AmericaUnited
McClintock has 21 percent of the Republican support versus 39 percent for Schwarzenkennedy. A shift of a mere 9 percent of that support would bring the two candidates into a tie. A ten percent shift would give McClintock the lead.

McClintock is a viable candidate--Buchanan was not.

McClintock's support is holding--actually climbing--despite a chorus of non-stop attacks by Schwarzenpubbies and the liberal media screaming that McClintock doesn't have a chance. That's pretty good for someone that you assure us is destined to be annihilated by Schwarzenkennedy.

I believe Dean will lose. Sure, I would be more than pleased if the Dims make him their go-to guy. But Dean is not McClintock. McClintock has a shot; Dean (at this point) does not.

83 posted on 08/24/2003 5:35:32 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson