So their actions are unconstitutional because you say that they are? What if I say that their actions are constitutional? Does that overrule you?
Remember that next time some anarchist or radical leftist uses the same justification for their breaking the law.
I guess we have to decide what is the ultimate authority. God or the gun. Really I think it is more dangerous to have gov't in religion than to have religion in gov't. European coutries have gov't sanctioned religions, but take a look at the Church of England. I'm not sure its a Christian church anymore. George Washington believed gov't should be austere and humble. Not haughty and hedonisitic. He recognized a transcendent higher authority than gov't. He was a deist, not an atheist. Some other people just have a problem with authority no matter what. Maybe the judge thinks: " If we don't recognize the authority of God then by what authority can I adjudicate the law as judge? By the business end of a gun? Then, what kind of country do we become? Think of every politcal, social, legal and economic disease you know. I don't think you can remove the philisophical and religous aspects of the law and still call it moral.