Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts
OK, this is what I don't understand. The SCOTUS refuses to take the appeal, but the appeal was of a federal judge's decision (a Clinton appointee, if I recall correctly). The feds are already involved. Why does the Supreme Ct. decide to sidestep this issue?
117 posted on 08/22/2003 3:19:01 PM PDT by My2Cents ("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: My2Cents
OK, this is what I don't understand. The SCOTUS refuses to take the appeal

Its my understanding they just refused to put a stay on the order to remove. They have not yet said one way or the other if they will take appeal.

188 posted on 08/22/2003 3:44:42 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson