Skip to comments.
FOX NEWS: ALABAMA TEN COMMANDMENTS JUDGE SUSPENDED...
Drudge Report ^
| 08/22/03
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 08/22/2003 2:40:17 PM PDT by Pokey78
Orlando Salinas broke in a few minutes ago and announced this on Fox News.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: falseidol; itsarock; publicproperty; roymoore; suspension; wackos; worshiptherock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 861-865 next last
To: Chad Fairbanks
As I have feared for many years liberalism is a widespread epidemic in the USA,with no cure in sight.
To: deedgirl
As I have feared for many years liberalism is a widespread epidemic in the USA,with no cure in sight.z An epidemic that appears to have spread to many of the so-called "conservatives" on this site.
To: deedgirl
I was going to post a similar depressing thought, but decided not to. :[
603
posted on
08/22/2003 9:02:19 PM PDT
by
Concentrate
(Is that clear enough?)
To: grayout
You are really sick. The Taliban of course gave *aid* to Osama Bin Laden, just the Biggest criminal (4,000 deaths or so) we've had that didnt run his own country. (In other words, he'd have to get in the Castro-Stalin-Saddam despot league to get any bigger body count.)
So what's this Bull about " The closest example we have of a crime and perversion free environment is under the Taliban." The Taliban WAS AND IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE AIDING TERRORISTS!!
NO, THE CLOSEST EXAMPLE WE HAVE OF CLEANING UP CRIME RECENTLY IS WHEN GULIANI CLEANED UP NYC AND CUT CRIME 30%. You know who was fighting him the whole way? The same Leftist nuisances like the ACLU who are fighting *against Judge Moore*, fighting for the 'right' for taxpayers to spend money on obscenity, the 'right' for panhandlers to harrass people in *public areas*, etc. THE ONLY THING THE ACLU DOESNT WANT OUT IN PUBLIC IS TESTAMENTS TO MORALITY.
Jeez, the idiocy of the anti-Moore comments just *compels* me to think these are DU disruptors, not real freepers. Are real freepers this nasty and evil against honest God-fearing folks? Why??!? Tell me real Freepers arent this *dumb* and *evil*, someone! Tell me it's a bad dream!
604
posted on
08/22/2003 9:04:01 PM PDT
by
WOSG
To: WOSG
BOO!
605
posted on
08/22/2003 9:05:23 PM PDT
by
Chancellor Palpatine
("what if the hokey pokey is really what its all about?" - Jean Paul Sartre)
To: Luis Gonzalez
In God We Trust" But it does not say "In The God Of Abraham We Trust"...does it?
What the....??? Check out American history. That's exactly what it means.
Man, public schools!
Vote chool choice!
606
posted on
08/22/2003 9:06:05 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifer lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: WOSG
THE ONLY THING THE ACLU DOESNT WANT OUT IN PUBLIC IS TESTAMENTS TO MORALITY. Very well then. We'll give them what they don't want... in abundance!
607
posted on
08/22/2003 9:07:49 PM PDT
by
Concentrate
(Don't take this lying down.)
To: aristeides
An epidemic that appears to have spread to many of the so-called "conservatives" on this site. And every one of them will be beating each other up to be first in line for the 666 to be carved into their foreheads.
608
posted on
08/22/2003 9:07:57 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifer lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: jwalsh07
Extreme Muslims heavily proselytize prisoners.
We have 2 million prisoners in this country.
It's not at all hyperbole to expect that in the relatively near future, there will be geographical regions of the United States with a majority Muslim population.
That is actually part of the plan...in Israel, and worldwide. Worldwide domination by demographics.
609
posted on
08/22/2003 9:09:24 PM PDT
by
ChemistCat
(It's National I'm Being Discriminated Against By Someone Day.)
To: deedgirl
Question for all you intelligent freepers,Are we to little
too late in this country where unfortunately for our future generations,liberal views are widely accepted.
To: Winfield
Catholic view of the 10 Commandments:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04153a.htm explains the minor difference between different versions of 10 commandments (same matter, just divided differently) and interesting comment at the end ...
"This legislation expresses not only the Maker's positive will, but the voice of nature as well--the laws which govern our being and are written more or less clearly in every human heart. The necessity of the written law is explained by the obscuring of the unwritten in men's souls by sin. These Divine mandates are regarded as binding on every human creature, and their violation, with sufficient reflection and consent of the will, if the matter be grave, is considered a grievous or mortal offense against God. They have always been esteemed as the most precious rules of life and are the basis of all Christian legislation."
611
posted on
08/22/2003 9:12:44 PM PDT
by
WOSG
To: concerned about politics
I don't need to check out the History books, I understand what the Founders did, unlike you.
They avoided placing a sectarian connotation on "God" in the Declaration of Independence "the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God", "that they are endowed by their Creator".
The Founders, having the opportunity to declare the US a Christian nation by the simple mentioning of Jesus Christ ANYWHERE in the Founding Documents, chose not to do so.
612
posted on
08/22/2003 9:12:48 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
(I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together)
To: John Twenty 28
...obeying all court orders isn't the "separation of powers". what is it then? "respect for the rule of law" ?
why don't you quit your whining and take your "majority" and elect some politician who will apoint judges who agree with your interpretation on this issue. oh wait, you can't, you have no such majority. for all your whining about the tyranny of judges one would think they were being appointed by some foreign hapsburg or hannover instead of by popularly elected americans.
To: ChemistCat
Meanwhile, we dismember our very young ones.
614
posted on
08/22/2003 9:13:14 PM PDT
by
Concentrate
(Don't take this lying down.)
To: deedgirl
Question for all you intelligent freepers,Are we to little too late in this country where unfortunately for our future generations,liberal views are widely accepted. Public indoctrination centers are cranking out liberal minions by the thousands each year. Those opposing Judge Moores freedoms also oppose school choice. It makes you wonder, doesn't it? Who's side are they really on?
Many vote libertarian, allowing for a Democrat win. Hmmmmm.
615
posted on
08/22/2003 9:15:25 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifer lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: SedVictaCatoni
Sed,
An establishment of religion has coercion.
The only coercion is coming from Judge Myron and the ACLU and the crowd that wants to FORCE the removal of a mere stone tablet. They fear and hate this tablet so much, they cannot abide its existence in a courthouse.
Today's American "Established Religion" and Wannabe tyranny is Political Correctness.
616
posted on
08/22/2003 9:18:27 PM PDT
by
WOSG
To: WOSG
I write "dictatorship of the Supreme Court" rather than "judicial tyranny" because so many folks can't distinguish a tyranny from a dinosaur. ;)
Seriously, it's amazing how many people can't imagine an alternative to judicial dictatorship.
To: WOSG
Are real freepers this nasty and evil against honest God-fearing folks? Why??!? Tell me real Freepers arent this *dumb* and *evil*, someone! Tell me it's a bad dream! That Taliban remark is totally out of line and on par with a lot of stuff I've seen here. But in all fairness, there has been plenty of nastiness and evil perpetrated by individuals on both sides of this issue, with personal insults, people calling people Communists, talking about Pryor's 'gestapo' (how I hate that sort of hyperbole), people calling people redneck, slack-jawed, inbred, Puritanical religious zealots, and if someone doesn't take the exact same position as someone, then they're going straight to Hell, or else they're Talibanistas, and Judge Moore is either Moses or some minor prophet or he's P.T. Barnum or Elmer Gantry. These Moore threads have degenerated to a sorry state and both sides are responsible; it's like looking at a multi-car pileup, and here I am rubbernecking, like a dang fool.
618
posted on
08/22/2003 9:20:32 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: deedgirl
We've been too late since the 50s....maybe earlier.
But we're not too late on this forum. We are the majority here by far. The ACLU pals are simply loud.
To: Luis Gonzalez
I don't need to check out the History books, I understand what the Founders did, unlike you. Nasty little angry thing, aren't you? Why such anger? Afraid you'll be cast out before your time?
No "wall of separation between church and state" exists in the U.S. Constitution. It is part of the old Socialist Soviet Russian Constitution, though, but America is a Free Republic, so it's simply anti-Christ propaganda. The only constitutional reference to religion appears in the First Amendment (1791), which prevents the government from establishing any particular sectarian denomination. It reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." That's it. No "wall of separation." Nothing about purging religious expression from the public square.
620
posted on
08/22/2003 9:21:29 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifer lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 861-865 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson