[SedVictaCatoni]

The honest argument is that there is no Constitutional prohibition on an individual employed by the government from expressing his personal religious belief.

You're absolutely right. Unfortunately, that has nothing to do with the circumstances of Judge Moore and his stone.

[Maelstrom]

That's the other problem.

It's just a stone, not a religious establishment, not really even a religious item.

It's merely a statue with a Biblical theme. Truly underlining the extent of anti-religion within the court system rather than emphasizing any separation between government and religion.