Any of you all agree?
I agree that Keyes comes off as angry, because he IS angry.
He's pissed that he has to deal with the rabble of the American public. Because, you see, Alan is perfect. Everything he says is perfect. What's more, he KNOWS he's perfect. He's moral, and we're not.
He has a very high opinion of himself, and he wallows in the praise he gets from sycophants like you.
Alan despises having to deal with the day-to-day, preferring to float on the clouds of moral indignation and sanctimony.
If there were a role of "National Preacher," Alan could certainly run for it, and might win it.
But, after the third sermon, everybody would be bored to death!
So, when you can't argue the content, you argue the person. Classicly Clintonian
Really? He was smiling during the entire debate and was quite amiable both times I've met him, and he doesn't know me from a hole in the wall.
"He's pissed that he has to deal with the rabble of the American public"
Post proof
"Because, you see, Alan is perfect.
Alan is a Christian and has acknowledged in public the fallen nature of man. The above sentiment is nothing more than venomous hyperbole. Why?
Everything he says is perfect. What's more, he KNOWS he's perfect. He's moral, and we're not.
Post proof
He has a very high opinion of himself, and he wallows in the praise he gets from sycophants like you.
Post proof.
And moreover, please indicate what I'm getting out of liking Alan Keyes? The term sycophant means "self-seeking flatterer", I'm gaining absolutely nothing by supporting Keyes, in fact, looking at this thread it seems as if I'm only getting criticism (and I'm shocked). What makes me or anyone else a "sycophant" for appreciating Dr. Keyes?
Alan despises having to deal with the day-to-day, preferring to float on the clouds of moral indignation and sanctimony.
Post proof
(snip remaining strange personal attacks)