Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vindiciae Contra TyrannoSCOTUS
Its too bad John Hostettler's amendment has not passed. I disagree with Governor Bob Riley and Bill Pryor. I believe the law can be a good thing - but I must cure the gentlemen in question of a misapprehension - that judges are always right. When a court should issue an order contrary to the Constitution and the rights that inhere me, it is my solemn duty is to disobey that order. Why? Because I fear God more than the edicts of man. For me there is an absolute sense of right and wrong that guides my path. And surely removing our nation's religious heritage from public view as if it were something to be ashamed of,can NEVER be right. And that is why Messers Riley and Pryor, I do not submit to the notion we have a duty to follow an unjust and immoral act even if it has imprimatur of a court. We do not. Q.E.D
57 posted on 08/21/2003 8:05:08 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop

When a court should issue an order contrary to the Constitution and the rights that inhere me, it is my solemn duty is to disobey that order. Why? Because I fear God more than the edicts of man. For me there is an absolute sense of right and wrong that guides my path.

The First Question - Whether subjects are obligated to obey rulers who issue commands contrary to the law of God. Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos

Mornay concludes his work with a strong plea for resistance to tyranny:

religion commands us to maintain the Law of God and to defend the church; justice commands us to use force against the tyrant who subverts the rights of a commonwealth; charity commands us to relieve the oppressed and to lend a helping hand. To deny these duties, then, is to will the extinction and removal of religion, justice, and charity from our midst.21

Vindiciae, therefore, does not argue for anarchy. It recommends resistance to tyranny based upon the authority of lower officers of the state. As such, it should be considered an argument for a conservative revolution.

President John Adams and his political theory have acquired new relevance as American evangelicals ponder afresh the relationship between Christian faith and the responsibilities of citizenship. For his own generation he brought to light the riches of reformational political theory. As Christians encounter increasing church / state conflict and the demands for loyalty from the modern secular state this reformational heritage needs another look. It is no longer tolerable for Christians today to cite Romans 13 as the sum total of biblical political theory--Romans 13 must be balanced by the teaching of Revelation 13. When the state usurps all authority--even that belonging to God--an altogether different response is needed. A Footnote to the Political Theory of John Adams Vindiciae contra ...

 

 

58 posted on 08/21/2003 8:09:47 PM PDT by Vindiciae Contra TyrannoSCOTUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson