Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: strela
The USSC apparently doesn't agree with you - they declined to get involved. I'll hold the counsel of the supreme law of the land over yours, thanks.

You're welcome. You can hold whatever you want to.

However your statements are factually incorrect. The USSC declined to hear the case which means they have rendered no opinion whatsoever. You can assume the meaning of that if you want but there is still no opinion to compare mine with. Since they didn't hear the case no counsel was held.

Fast and loose with the facts doesn't cut it.

88 posted on 08/21/2003 8:33:53 PM PDT by TigersEye (Regime change in the Supreme Court. - Impeach Activist Judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
However your statements are factually incorrect. The USSC declined to hear the case which means they have rendered no opinion whatsoever.

That's what I said, genius. My exact words were "The USSC apparently doesn't agree with you - they declined to get involved." You really need to work on that reading comprehension thing.

91 posted on 08/21/2003 11:35:04 PM PDT by strela ("Each of us can find a maggot in our past which will happily devour our futures." Horatio Hornblower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson