I don't believe it was. Was it?
Care to explain this one a bit more completely?
The Church of England was prescribed by British law. Everything religious had to conform to its mandates. Now Judge Moore makes an expression of his religious convictions, breaking no state laws, and a federal judge and court have ordered him to conform to their religious standards which happens to be 'no expression of religion allowed'. They have told him what he can and can't do respecting the establishment of his religion. His expression was in concert with the Alabama State Constitution as expressed in its preamble. It invoked the power of the Almighty. He invoked the power of the Almighty. The 11th Circuit Court violated the Tenth Amendment by intervening in a State matter that is not delegated to the U.S. gov. by the federal Constitution. Their Constitution. Both Thompson and the 11th have violated Moore's 1st A. rights of freedom of speech and free exercise of religion.
The USSC apparently doesn't agree with you - they declined to get involved. I'll hold the counsel of the supreme law of the land over yours, thanks.