[inquest]

Friend, I never was talking about equal-protection - you were, all along.

Your response at #379 to my challenge at #363 contained the following statement: "No more divine right of kings, please - Judge Moore does not have special liberties unavailable to everyone else. Such is the clear and explicit meaning of 'equal protection under the law'."

You didn't quote any other portion of the 14th amendment. If that was an oversight on your part, then that's perfectly understandable. We can start again if you want, beginning with my statement at #363.

[general_re]

Oh, for crying out loud - I'm not writing an amicus brief here. I'm simply trying to explain why I feel that the court made the right decision. You've taken a throwaway comment and turned it into the crux of my argument, when all along I've been specifically concentrating on and commenting on the establishment clause in a dozen other posts.