Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas
I note that you are silent about the court cases provided that show the 14th Amendment was not intended to apply the Bill of Rights to the states.

Amendments 2 through 10 always were meant to apply to the States since there is no mention of Congress being prohibited from the actions mentioned in those amendments.

I find it odd that you think States can enact any gun laws they want since the 2nd "Wasn't meant to apply to the States". Oh, wait, its just that the FIRST wasn't meant to apply to the States, right? That opens up an entirely different can of worms considering that States could ban whatever print they wish.

545 posted on 08/21/2003 12:47:48 PM PDT by HurkinMcGurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]


To: HurkinMcGurkin
The 14th does contain a limitation in its own text. But, it it not to the extent that courts today rule it is.
549 posted on 08/21/2003 12:49:32 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson