Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
Nope. In his own words, he said that those things were not within the proper definition of "religion." Do you agree or disagree?
517 posted on 08/21/2003 12:33:50 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
In his own words, he said that those things were not within the proper definition of "religion." Do you agree or disagree?

They are not within the definition of the word "religion" as modified by the word "establishment".

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. If you're trying to suggest that he's out to trample on the rights of non-Judeo-Christians, I'd be interested in seeing how. It would be rather out of character for him, since he'd be violating the word of God, as he understands it, if he were to do so.

561 posted on 08/21/2003 12:55:08 PM PDT by inquest (We are NOT the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson