[rwfromkansas]

Granted, but it is the principle that I am looking at here.

There is no violation of the Constitituion, though the courts claim there is.

[concerned about politics]

Granted, but it is the principle that I am looking at here.

There is no violation of the Constitituion, though the courts claim there is.

True, but he can shut them up by adding a cheap book case with other religious books to make their complaints null and void. They can't say what religion he's establishing, because according to them, all religions are acknowledged, and he's not "attacking" anyone.
It would be a check mate, wouldn't it? It would be freedom of religion for all faiths, no?