[rwfromkansas]

Please prove that Moore is in violation of the law.

Note these requirements for proof:

1. primary source documents of the debate on the First Amendment supporting your position
2. quotes from the founding fathers...beyond personal opinion on religion...indicating support for your position.
3. historical precedent ***starting in 1789 and up to no later than 1900*** that supports your views
4. judicial precedent " "

If you can do this, I will take your opinion seriously and have to seriously consider whether you may be correct.

I won't hold my breath waiting for this evidence, as I know it isn't coming.

[jethropalerobber]

Note these requirements for proof:
...
3. historical precedent ***starting in 1789 and up to no later than 1900*** that supports your views

that's an interesting condition.

should he make his argument blindfolded and with one hand tied behind his back also?