Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Question_Assumptions
In other words, this has nothing to do with whether the company paid for the software or not but whether they are in technical violation of the license.

Not a "technical violation". They don't even have the licenses, for chrissakes...
102 posted on 08/21/2003 2:24:40 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Bush2000
Not a "technical violation". They don't even have the licenses, for chrissakes...

Is it more important to you that they paid for the software they are using or that they have a paper license for every piece of software they have installed, whether they are using it or not? You seem much more concerned over the pieces of paper (which you have mentioned several times in this thread) than with whether or not the company actually paid for what they were using. You are more concerned with the technicalities of the license than with fair payment for use, which you simply assume that this company didn't do, despite the fact that the owner claims otherwise.

110 posted on 08/21/2003 2:59:47 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson