To: TheAngryClam
Be amazed then. Creationism has nothing to do with alchemy.
6 posted on
08/20/2003 6:56:34 PM PDT by
thulldud
(It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
To: thulldud
They're exactly comparable: utterly fantastical and false belief systems, which have a large following built up around their false and/or unprovable premises.
8 posted on
08/20/2003 6:58:40 PM PDT by
TheAngryClam
(TOM McCLINTOCK is my choice for governor. He should be yours too.)
To: thulldud
Creationism has nothing to do with alchemy.Nor does it have anything to do with science. Creationism is trying like the camel to sneak its nose under the tent of science. Whether one subscribes to creationism or to evolution is secondary to the major issue: for creationism to be considered as science it must first become a science by virtue of using the scientific method to establish a data base. All the heated rhetoric in the world will not make creationism what it is not: science.
78 posted on
08/20/2003 10:12:58 PM PDT by
Rudder
To: thulldud
So did God create a path in animals that would be mistaken for evolution on purpose?
To: thulldud
Ain't it the truth. The fundamental law of biology is that life cannot emanate from non-life. Yet evolutionary hypothesis says that's exactly what happened.
Evolutionary hypothesis says life began under conditions that cannot be reproduced. If it cannot be reproduced, then it cannot be demonstrated. That means it (evolutionary hypothesis) is unscientific.
The fact is, it takes more faith to believe in evolution than to believe in God.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson