[thulldud]

Be amazed then. Creationism has nothing to do with alchemy.

[TheAngryClam]

They're exactly comparable: utterly fantastical and false belief systems, which have a large following built up around their false and/or unprovable premises.

[Rudder]

Creationism has nothing to do with alchemy.

Nor does it have anything to do with science. Creationism is trying like the camel to sneak its nose under the tent of science. Whether one subscribes to creationism or to evolution is secondary to the major issue: for creationism to be considered as science it must first become a science by virtue of using the scientific method to establish a data base. All the heated rhetoric in the world will not make creationism what it is not: science.

[Almondjoy]

So did God create a path in animals that would be mistaken for evolution on purpose?

[hoosierskypilot]

Ain't it the truth. The fundamental law of biology is that life cannot emanate from non-life. Yet evolutionary hypothesis says that's exactly what happened.

Evolutionary hypothesis says life began under conditions that cannot be reproduced. If it cannot be reproduced, then it cannot be demonstrated. That means it (evolutionary hypothesis) is unscientific.

The fact is, it takes more faith to believe in evolution than to believe in God.