Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SedVictaCatoni
Why not teach both? How long would it take to teach "creationism", anyway? An hour? Genesis isn't really all that long.

Why should a religious story be taught outside of a religious studies class at all? Further, Genesis is not the only "creation" story out there.
39 posted on 08/20/2003 8:01:17 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
Why should a religious story be taught outside of a religious studies class at all? Further, Genesis is not the only "creation" story out there.

Shrug, no kidding. But I figured it would be a good compromise to let kids listen to an hour of highly allegorical Jewish mythology, and then settle in to the alternate explanation of evolution.

Nobody seems much interested in compromises, though.

42 posted on 08/20/2003 8:03:00 PM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (An embarrassed Christian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
Why should a religious story be taught outside of a religious studies class at all? Further, Genesis is not the only "creation" story out there.

Why don’t they just teach Intelligent Design vs. stupid design?

You have obviously picked your “creation” story…

52 posted on 08/20/2003 8:24:41 PM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
"Why should a religious story be taught outside of a religious studies class at all? Further, Genesis is not the only "creation" story out there."

If nothing else it would serve to puncture the myth developed by Western rationalist philosophers that there is a great divide between different modes of thinking and they belong in separate spheres of reality. Descartes and his dualism thing. Wrong, one reality. Actually there is not a divide between faith and reason, the greatest philosophers (Aristotle, Aquinas, Kant) tried to bridge that gap. Science is not "self-reliant" as an epistemology, as it relies on the testimony of the senses - but how much can you trust them? So is "senses" more or less trustworthy than "revealed truth"? ... Maybe this belongs more in 'philosophy of science' but at least *presenting the creation stories* then explaining what they explain and what they dont explain would help kids THINK. ("So how old is the earth, anyway?")

And isnt that what teaching is supposed to be all about?

This nonsense of kicking out everything not 'official science' is well, er, narrowminded. So yes, teach Genesis and the other 'creation' stories as a part of attempts to deal with and understand the created universe, then explain what Aristotle figured out and then what others figured out along the way.

69 posted on 08/20/2003 9:32:59 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
good point.
(sparkle motion?)
89 posted on 08/21/2003 12:17:32 AM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson