Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metacognative
Intelligent Design questions the scientific basis for evolution

But does a very poor job. We've been through eyes, puffer fish, sex, platypus, echo-location, flagella... what's funny is the ID crowd will pore over nature magazine and find something they don't understand. Then scientists put more study into it, publish papers on it, and sew up any holes that may exist. In an ironic way, science can thank ID'ers for pointing out things that can be studied more closely.

And btw, scientific hypotheses need to propose something. ID is simply literary criticism and creationism dressed up all pretty with a little lipstick on.
110 posted on 08/21/2003 7:40:57 AM PDT by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: whattajoke
A lot of wishful thinking in your paragraph. Can you think scientifically without the straw man 'creationism'? Are you a hard core atheist? Read " Evolution in Crisis" by Michael Denton.
124 posted on 08/21/2003 10:25:56 AM PDT by metacognative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson