Evolutionary hypothesis says life began under conditions that cannot be reproduced. If it cannot be reproduced, then it cannot be demonstrated. That means it (evolutionary hypothesis) is unscientific.
The fact is, it takes more faith to believe in evolution than to believe in God.
You may want to look at the work of Urey and Miller in 1953 for starters, and do some Google searches for more recent works, such as http://www.origins.rpi.edu/chem.html. That will be a good starting place for you. Your first sentence and following statements would have been accurate in the mid to late 1800s versus.
And, evolution is still nothing more than an hypothesis, i.e., a guess.
In The Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, (1960, pp.6,7) W.R. Thompson points out that "Modern Darwinism palaeontologists are obliged, just like their predecessors and like Darwin, to water down the facts with subsidiary hypothesis, which, however plausible, are in the nature of things, unverifiable.....This situation, where scientific men rally to the defence of a doctrine they are unable to define scientifically, much less demonstrate with scientific rigour, attempting to maintain its credit with the public by the suppression of criticism and the elimination of difficulties, is abnormal and undesirable in science."
I repeat, I stand by what I said.