Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas
Well, the courts say the 14th Amendment applies the BOR to the states (they are wrong). But, even if it did, posting the Ten Commandments would not meet the test for what an "establishment of religion" is. That was a very narrow restriction.

Disagree with your first statement halfway, agree with the second.

The 14th incorporates itself to the States by its own terms, not by court decisions, and also all the articles of the Bill of Rights via the "Rights and Immunities" clause.

And I agree with you that posting the Mosaic law on a courthouse lawn as a memorial doesn't rise to "establishment" in the sense the Framers meant it.

If the Judge planned to post the Commandments, and then refer to them when ruling on motions or handing down sentences, then that would be "establishment", in the same sense that Islamic republics establish Sharia.

227 posted on 08/21/2003 3:46:38 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
The 14th incorporates itself to the States by its own terms

Were its authors aware of its secret anti-religious meaning?

229 posted on 08/21/2003 3:53:26 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson