[Lazamataz]

You should have kept your pants on.

Hang on for a tick. These are married -- and divorced -- men. Are you saying men should avoid marriage and the creation of children inside the institution of marriage at all costs?

Whaddya, a Feminist?

Well, that's too harsh. I don't mean to be harsh. But I do want you to think about what you are saying.

[A. Pole]

[4Liberty:]
"You should have kept your pants on."

Hang on for a tick. These are married -- and divorced -- men. Are you saying men should avoid marriage and the creation of children inside the institution of marriage at all costs?

Whaddya, a Feminist?

More likely he is a free trader. He things that making children should be outsourced to the countries where it is cheaper. Then the next generation of Americans can be replaced by immigrants.

[Mike4Freedom]

Are you saying men should avoid marriage and the creation of children inside the institution of marriage at all costs?

A marriage strike by men until these laws are changed would be quite appropriate.

[familyop]

"Hang on for a tick. These are married -- and divorced -- men. Are you saying men should avoid marriage and the creation of children inside the institution of marriage at all costs?"

Men are stupid to get married or to have anything to do with
women. False accusations or poverty are all that are needed
to imprison these men (federal), thanks to our socialist
Republican and Democrat politicians who passed Hitlery's
laws (VAWA, Child Support Act, etc.).

Those laws are unconstitutional (debtors' prisons,
imprisonment for no more than accusations,...).