Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DittoJed2
Honestly, I've never considered that question. I know that mammoths haven't been discovered around dinosaurs, at least nearby.

There aren't any mammoths around trilobites, either.

958 posted on 08/18/2003 2:10:34 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Incorrect. A mammoth was found in Newark, Ohio- Ohio being a prime area for Trilobites.
963 posted on 08/18/2003 2:16:20 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies ]

To: VadeRetro
Incidentally, if you are referring to layer, trilobites were sea creatures (interesting they are found in great numbers in Ohio) and Mammoths were land. Trilobites would naturally be at a bottom layer while mammoths would be higher up since the trilobite was already in the water.
971 posted on 08/18/2003 2:22:57 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson