[VadeRetro]

A reading of the second link of 925 led me at once to the conclusion that it was the article of which Ichneumon's post 436 on this thread is a very detailed rebuttal.

It's bad form to openly continue trolling for suckers with thoroughly discredited material.

[AndrewC]

It's bad form to openly continue trolling for suckers with thoroughly discredited material.

Is this a warning to someone?

[Da_Shrimp]

A reading of the second link of 925 led me at once to the conclusion that it was the article of which Ichneumon's post 436 on this thread is a very detailed rebuttal.

After looking at the link, it's one I've seen before. It's not convincing: the Cocconino Sandstone is still very much a desert sandstone.