[PatrickHenry]

I'm puzzled as how you can conclude that when neither of you addressed anything to the aggrieved party? Plus I fail to see how Post 72 is anything but inflammatory.

I assume "the aggrieved party" you're speaking of is gore3000. All my agreement-related posts concerning his conduct were addressed to him. As for post 72, ALS had previously been declared a troll in accordance with the agreement. My comments were thus not improper. It seems you are greatly interested in the agreement. Why not sign on to it? Try it; you'll like it.

[AndrewC]

I assume "the aggrieved party" you're speaking of is gore3000.

No. I meant StolarStorm who was the person supposed to be liable to be drawn into a flame war.

It seems you are greatly interested in the agreement. Why not sign on to it? Try it; you'll like it.

Why would I desire to do that? I have not been abusive, in my mind, to anyone that was civil to me. That is unless you have something I am not aware of. I need no agreement to be civil. I do not need to shout troll. I merely ask them to cease. Try it, you might like it. It works.