To: Aric2000
That was an attack on a poster Andrew, and therefore per the agreement I am in full compliance.Did you see ALS as an addressee in my post? Did you see a DittoJed2 as an addressee? Now follow the thread back from Post 56. It goes 56-51-46-43-28. Now who is being discussed? But wait a minute, here is a post about that who.
Is this not a gratuitous and disruptive comment in its context? Now back to the chain which leads to ALS comment. I agree with ALS in light of the belittling of DittoJed2 and especially due to this barb from post 51 ---who have no belief (or understanding) of the scientific method
. I do understand the scientific method. I also understand logic and not the Marilyn Monroe kind.
93 posted on
08/14/2003 8:45:39 PM PDT by
AndrewC
To: AndrewC
I did not interject a thing until that post by the KNOWN troller.
If you were offended by the Medved remark, then perhaps you should have responded to it, instead of defending a known, tried and true disruptive trollish, flamewar starting poster.
Perhaps? just maybe?
Again, if you wish to discuss this further, please take it to the phoebe thread.
There WAS a science discussion going on here.
95 posted on
08/14/2003 8:54:16 PM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson