Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Da_Shrimp
Well, I believe the Wooly mammoth was a type of early mammoth. Since almost everyone agrees that micro-evolution, that is variation within a kind, occurs, then the modern elephant can just be seen as a later form of mammoth.
915 posted on 08/18/2003 1:11:30 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 847 | View Replies ]


To: DittoJed2
Well, I believe the Wooly mammoth was a type of early mammoth. Since almost everyone agrees that micro-evolution, that is variation within a kind, occurs, then the modern elephant can just be seen as a later form of mammoth.

That's as may be: however, the question was about why elephant bones are never, ever found with dinosaur bones. Mammoth bones are never, ever found with dinosaur bones either. Why is that?

It's a genuine question, as I've never heard or read a Creationist argument that explains these things adequately.

920 posted on 08/18/2003 1:16:19 PM PDT by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies ]

To: DittoJed2
...that is variation within a kind...

Are horses, donkeys, zebras, etc. the same or different 'kinds'?

Conventionally, they're considered different species in the same genus.

1,171 posted on 08/18/2003 8:37:21 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson