To: RightWingNilla
Yes it is a science thread. Allbeit I have not seen much science discussed as of yet. I think I will refrain friend.
To: concisetraveler
I think I will refrain friend. Hmm. Are you certain the evidence you have seen favors Special Creation so clearly?
To: concisetraveler
I will make these few accute observations in the article given here:
How do they know it was a carnivore for sure?
They only found a partial skeleton and filled in the rest
Cretaceous period (from a previous belief Lyelle)
they claim it is 65 million years old? How do they know?
They elaborate that this will help explain the "shifting continents, and how is that?
Every time we read an article about these creatures found or partial skeletons which is usually the case, sometimes even just a few bones, we will get so much more in the article that presumes truth. Read this article from a perspective of taking away the "geologic column" and remember that the scientists are probably bias, and see what you read. It is fascinating when you remove the pre-assumtions.
The one and only thing I got from the article is that they may have found some bones (no piuctures) and some eggs of an unknown animal.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson