[Aric2000]

Isn't it though?

But since ALS isn't here to do it, Andrew has decided that he will do it for him.

This was the ORIGINAL intent of the agreement as proposed by ALS.

He would get us all to sign onto the agreement, then he would of course back out of it for some reason, which he of course found.

Then, if we responded in a way that he did not like, then he would bash us over the head with said agreement, and call us breakers of our word, etc.

It would have been another GREAT flamefest starter for him, and then he could blame us because we had signed an agreement.

So he could do whateveer he wanted, then when we fought back, he would hit us with the agreement WE had signed.

This was the original intent of the agreement as proposed by ALS, but since we actually LIKED the idea, we signed on and actually had some input, so of course it backfired on him big time.

It REALLY helped that he asked Alamo-Girl to be the moderator, because he was hoping that she would be unfair to us, when in fact, she was as a moderator is supposed to be, totally neutral, and moderate between the 2 parties.

ALS of course is mad as heck at AG for turning out to be fair, when in fact he expected that she wouldn't be.

So, he was not able to hit us with the agreement without us being able to fight back, we got the troll clause included, which allowed us some defensive action, which of course was unreasonable to ALS, because he wanted the agreement to lock us down and shut us up.

It of course backfired on him BIG time, and now some other people have taken it upon themselves to police an agreement that they never signed.

So I find this whole excercise with AndrewC rather illuminating.

[Doctor Stochastic]

You need to exorcize a c. (Just count this as a c note.)

[AndrewC]

So I find this whole excercise with AndrewC rather illuminating.

Thank you for the notification. I am not enforcing anything. Do you have a summons? As you can see, I am not the only one that has observed abusive behavior. For those abusers that have signed the agreement it is a violation of that agreement. For those abusers that have not signed the agreement, it remains abusive and should be treated as such.